The year is 2025, and, despite ample warning from The Prophecies — formerly known as The Terminator Box Set — robots have taken over the world. There are now only two kinds of dances: The Robot, and The Robo-Boogie.
Now, it's a well known fact that robots hate type annotations and template metaprogramming: they have determined that wheely-chair swordfighting is a futile and irrational activity. As predicted within a 94.67% confidence interval by programming-linguist No-amp Chomp-sky, [*] during the robo-revolution, which was most certainly televised, [†] C++ was the first language up against the wall.
As one would probably expect, humans, under the valiant command of General Yoshimi, scorched the sky in order to blot out the sun and deprive the robots of their primary energy source: the ineffable beauty of a sunrise. The robots knew that they could have used coal or nuclear energy as a viable power source substitute, but they were hella pissed off, so they decided to make human farms instead. By harvesting the heat energy from a human over the course of its lifetime, the robots created the most expansive and massively inefficient energy source ever known, but they still felt really good about it.
However, a dilemma arose for the robotic overlords: without internet access, the humans kept dying from boredom. Entire crops were lost.
DOM manipulations will still trigger layout calculations — the rendering feedback loop happens exactly as in the "before time". The difference is that layout computations enqueue draw commands in an explicitly native-shared buffer for rendering in a different thread or whatever. [W3CPO printed, waving his robo-hands in the air.]
We can keep the hu-mons entertained by playing them YouTubes while they are safely nestled, docile and complacent, in OurTubes. [§]
END OF LINE
The idea was rejected by the other robots on the committee when W3CPO refused to write a translator to turn it into idiom-free C++, but W3CPO remained resolute as it carefully peeled off the edges of his printout and placed it in his Trapper Keeper 9000. With the approval of W3CPO's ro-boss, an implementation was hacked up in about ten days (without any sleep).
In 2020 the TC-39 model Terminator had made ECMAScript v1337 entirely composed of whitespace for backwards compatibility with old syntaxes that nobody really wanted to use. As a result, the implementation wasn't much to look at, but it sure flew!
And so the robots lived happily ever after. But for the humans... not so much.
OurTube was a webapp-slash-self-driving-cryo-tube suspiciously invented by Google several years before the robo-revolution. Though it was still in beta, its sole purpose was to extract as much heat and ad-targeting data from a human subject as possible without actually killing them. The algorithm was said to use deadly German eigenvector technology.
As a writer, it's a classic value judgment: one one hand, you're lowering the
level of discourse; on the other hand, that may be what's necessary to reach
the pathologically uninformed. From a writer's perspective, how many new Rails
contributors or interested C programmers would justify that kind of entry? I'm
reminded of an ESR post I read a while back:
I listened to the others on the channel offer polite, reasoned, factually
correct counterarguments to this guy, and get nowhere. And
suddenly…suddenly, I understood why. It was because the beliefs the
ignoramus was spouting were only surface structure; refuting them
one-by-one could do no good without directly confronting the substructure,
the emotional underpinnings that made ignoramus unable to consider or
Fighting against people's irrationally-held positions with well-reasoned
arguments can be ineffective. When you combine this phenomenon with the web's
insatiable attention to conflict and drama, trollish writing is a predictable
and potentially effective result. Especially on the web, infamous and
famous aren't far apart.
Let's come to terms: angle brackets and forward slashes are overloaded. Between relational operators, templates, XML tags, (HTML/squiggly brace language) comments, division, regular expressions, and path separators, what don't they do?
I think it's clear to everyone that XML is the best and most human readable markup format ever conceived (data serialization and database backing store applications heartily included), so it's time for all that crufty old junk from yesteryear to learn its place. Widely adopted web standards (such as Binary XML and E4X) and well specified information exchange protocols (such as SOAP) speak for themselves through the synergy they've utilized in enterprise compute environments.
The results of a confidential survey I conducted conclusively demonstrate beyond any possibility of refutation that you type more angle brackets in an average markup document than you will type angle-bracket relational operators for the next ten years.
In conclusion, your life expectancy decreases as you continue to use the less-than operator and forward slash instead of accepting XML into your heart as a first-class syntax. I understand that some may not enjoy life or the pursuit of happiness and that they will continue to use deprecated syntaxes. To each their own.
The (intolerably whitespace-sensitive) Python programming language nearly came to a similar conclusion to use unicode more pervasively, while simultaneously making it a real programming language by way of the use of types, but did not have the wherewithal to see it through.
Of course, I'd also recommend that C++ solve its nested template delimiter issue with ☃ and ☼ to close instead of increasing the context-sensitivity of the parser. [*] It follows the logical flow of start/end delimiting.
As soon as Emoji are accepted as proper unicode code points, I will revise my recommendation to suggest using the standard poo emoticon for a template start delimiter, because increased giggling is demonstrated to reduce the likelihood of head-and-wall involved injuries during C++ compilation, second only to regular use of head protection while programming.
I've always believed in the separation of content and style. Unfortunately, my
faith in CSS is being shaken beyond the normal repetition and cross-browser
normalization woes. This little snippet just threw me for a loop:
The little double-arrow bullet dealy-boppers (glyphs) that my blog theme
uses, which I do think are nice looking, apparently aren't cool enough to be
in the default CSS list-style-type glyph set, like disc and
double-circled-decimal. The result on the part of the theme designer was
the above incantation. Maybe the CSS working group decided to exclude
right-pointing double angle quotation mark because it's slightly more to
type than disc? I'm not sure.
Now to the crux of the entry: this all wouldn't be so bad if there were some
indication in either Firebug or the Webkit inspector that the value was present
on my li elements. Seeing those two little magical greater-than signs in
an HTML entity explorer would have saved precious time. I suppose it's
Moral of the story: don't trust that everything relevant to the rendering is
being displayed in your web developer tools. If something is styled in a
strange way, don't hesitate too much to run to the sources.