Contributing to SpiderMonkey
My latest experiment is "slide casting" — here's Contributing to SpiderMonkey (a slidecast that's less than four minutes long):
Mozilla manifesto (English)
- Contributing to SpiderMonkey
As a guy who writes code, there are a few basic things I ask before I jump into any project:
Will I learn?
Do the people rock?
Will it ship?
Does it matter?
I guarantee that you'll learn from working on SpiderMonkey. It's an important language implementation created by some of the most brilliant and approachable coders I've ever had the privilege of working with.
We ship like clockwork. When a patch gets submitted to trunk, it's in the Firefox release 18 weeks later.
- Hack: this technology could fall into the right hands [image]
And when it comes to finding meaning in your work, Mozilla makes life easy.
In my opinion, the Mozilla mission is technological utopianism at its finest. If you believe in using your technological superpowers to help people, Mozilla is for you.
If you know how to write and debug C++ code, you have the skills to hack SpiderMonkey. We don't go crazy with the C++, so C coders should also feel pretty confident. The only tools required are the ones necessary to build Firefox.
SpiderMonkey is a language implementation, but don't let that get to you. Once you get your hands dirty (say, by fixing a few minor bugs) you'll realize that language VMs are no different from the other systems-level programs that you know and love.
The JS team tries to tag good first bugs. If you see a good first bug that interests you, feel free to go in and make a comment stating your interest.
If you'd like to ease into development a little more, you can check out the latest ECMAScript specification and use that to create tests for our test suite. This is a great way to ensure SpiderMonkey engine quality and cross-browser compatibility.
In typical open-source style, once you've found something that interests you, hack away!
And feel free to sample from the buffet: every bug that you work on teaches you about a different aspect of the engine.
You may also stumble onto a part of the engine that you'd like to specialize in — we loving having domain experts hacking on our code as well!
When you improve the engine, you can get your name added to about:credits, in a product that ships to something like half a billion users, which I think is pretty cool.
Lots of great details and walkthroughs are available on the "New to SpiderMonkey" wiki page.
- Barrel (#coding, #jsapi)
Friendly people hang around in these IRC channels at irc.mozilla.org. #coding is for general questions, whereas #jsapi is for JS engine internals discussion. You can easily install ChatZilla as a Firefox add-on to get on IRC.
If you've had bad experiences with IRC in the past, fear not!@ I know, from personal experience, that the IRC moderators in these channels have a zero-tolerance policy for disrespectful behavior. We love (and are) our community.
- On my back
I haven't provided any kind of engine internals overview, but I think this may be just enough information to get you intrepid hackers going.
I may find time to do more screencasts in the future, but don't wait on me. (I'm new to this whole medium and prefer to write code. ;-) In the meantime, there's a screencast intro on hacking the SpiderMonkey shell available on my blog.
The beauty of software, especially open source, is that you can mess around without taking any risks and by satisfying very few dependencies (i.e. a computer and the ability to install open source software).
Like the slogan says, with you hacking on Mozilla, the technology may have feallen into the right hands.
So, I hope that you'll consider hacking with us!
Please excuse my use of the colloqualism, "as a guy who writes code." On a second listen I realize it may be poorly placed, because I'm using my own criteria as an example of an arbitrary person who might be considering contributing to the Mozilla project — no gender implication for contributors was at all intended!
More fortunately, this note is a great opportunity for me to plug WoMoz, Mozilla's project to promote women's involvement in open source and encourage contributions. You can find members on #womoz on irc.mozilla.org.
Thoughts on the idea of "slidecasts"
Just to get this established up front: I'm super rusty at presenting any kind of material. Also, I've never tried to record a presentation on the same computer that I was reading notes off of. (Case in point: you can hear the clicking of a keypress when I change slides.)
Despite all this hedging, I'm not sure about slidecasts as a medium. I sometimes fumble when I ad-lib, so I effectively had to write out a whole script for these slides. That's why it sounds like I'm reading off of a piece of paper.
Screencasts (as opposed to slidecasts) are different because you're walking through a sequence of on-screen editing actions that are inherently difficult to put into words. It's also a lot of fun to see how somebody else uses their development environment.
Slidecasts harness the poignant messaging of slides, but lose the body language of recorded audience presentations, which is clearly an important component. Turning the slidecast script into words would have been simple, and potentially more accessible to people who don't have the time to watch video content at all.
...or maybe it's humanizing? I'm not sure. Perhaps I have to add more soaring rhetoric and fancy slides to make spoken word worthwhile.
Clearly, more experimentation is needed!