Comments on: Thoughts on programming language fluency http://blog.cdleary.com/2009/11/thoughts-on-programming-language-fluency/ __author__ = 'Chris Leary' Mon, 06 Sep 2010 19:31:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: uberVU - social comments http://blog.cdleary.com/2009/11/thoughts-on-programming-language-fluency/comment-page-1/#comment-1340 uberVU - social comments Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:43:33 +0000 http://blog.cdleary.com/?p=661#comment-1340 <strong>Social comments and analytics for this post...</strong> This post was mentioned on Twitter by Chris Leary: New blog post: Thoughts on programming language fluency http://blog.cdleary.com/2009/11/thoughts-on-programming-language-fluency/...

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by Chris Leary: New blog post: Thoughts on programming language fluency http://blog.cdleary.com/2009/11/thoughts-on-programming-language-fluency/...

]]> By: Tweets that mention VaporWarning» Blog Archive » Thoughts on programming language fluency -- Topsy.com http://blog.cdleary.com/2009/11/thoughts-on-programming-language-fluency/comment-page-1/#comment-1338 Tweets that mention VaporWarning» Blog Archive » Thoughts on programming language fluency -- Topsy.com Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:31:39 +0000 http://blog.cdleary.com/?p=661#comment-1338 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Chris Leary and erin dylan, Jose Ayala. Jose Ayala said: VaporWarning» Blog Archive » Thoughts on programming language fluency: Thoughts on programming language fluency.. http://bit.ly/5crowo [...]

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Chris Leary and erin dylan, Jose Ayala. Jose Ayala said: VaporWarning» Blog Archive » Thoughts on programming language fluency: Thoughts on programming language fluency.. http://bit.ly/5crowo [...]

]]> By: Roberto Liffredo http://blog.cdleary.com/2009/11/thoughts-on-programming-language-fluency/comment-page-1/#comment-1337 Roberto Liffredo Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:38:55 +0000 http://blog.cdleary.com/?p=661#comment-1337 I think the point is when you need that person to be effective. If you need him yesterday, then Laurie is the only logical choice; if you need to build up a team for a several years project, then Fry is definitely a better option. However, most of the time hiring managers need to give result quick - and therefore, Laurie gets more chances, especially in "enterprisey" environments. I think the point is when you need that person to be effective. If you need him yesterday, then Laurie is the only logical choice; if you need to build up a team for a several years project, then Fry is definitely a better option.

However, most of the time hiring managers need to give result quick – and therefore, Laurie gets more chances, especially in “enterprisey” environments.

]]>